***
Starting with Apex code saved using Salesforce.com API version 24.0 and later, test methods don’t have access by default to pre-existing data in the organization, such as standard objects, custom objects, and custom settings data, and can only access data that they create. However, objects that are used to manage your organization or metadata objects can still be accessed in your tests such as:
User
Profile
Organization
AsyncApexJob
CronTrigger
RecordType
ApexClass
ApexTrigger
ApexComponent
ApexPage
Profile
Organization
AsyncApexJob
CronTrigger
RecordType
ApexClass
ApexTrigger
ApexComponent
ApexPage
Whenever possible, you should create test data for each test. You can disable this restriction by annotating your test class or test method with the IsTest(SeeAllData=true) annotation.
Test code saved using Salesforce.com API version 23.0 or earlier continues to have access to all data in the organization and its data access is unchanged.
***
I've seen and heard many people claim that setting this attribute to true was a bad practice. Go ahead and google it. You'll find plenty of well-intentioned people telling you that you should never (or very rarely) set it to true and warn you like they were saving you from some kind of doom.
I say that there are plenty of reasons to use it and removing this from your tool set, puts you at a disadvantage. Let's look at a couple examples of where I see some utility:
- Existing org data
- Volume
- Quality
- Custom settings
Setting SeeAllData to false (or accepting the current default), limits your test methods from existing org data. So for example, if you were to query for an existing account and set a field value in your test method, you'd end up with a query exception. If you were the developer of a managed package, you'd probably be smart enough to recognize that this scenario and that your account doesn't exist in your customer's org, so you'd need to create a new account in your test methods. In this case, SeeAllData = false, makes sense because you cannot assume that your test data exists in someone else's org.
If you were the developer of your company's internal Salesforce instance, your perspective and use cases are likely to be different. Imagine you've created a vf page that aggregates some account data. For a page that does a lot of soql queries, you may be concerned about performance or governor limits. If your org had millions of accounts, you could make your test methods try to simulate your account data volume, but it might be smarter to make use your existing data in your full sandbox also. Running apex tests for both new and existing data, you'll be more confident in how your application behaves in production.
Data quality is another place where setting SeeAllData = false may leave you vulnerable. Let's say your org's history was something like this:
- In January, your users started using opportunities
- Later in March, they created a validation rule to make a field required on opportunities
- In June, you were asked to come in and add a trigger to activities to automatically update the related opportunity
If you were using SeeAllData = false, your test methods would create a new account and opportunity, create a related Task, and successfully assert that the Opportunity was updated by your new trigger. Your test opportunity would have been created with all of the required data and your trigger would pass your unit tests. However, the trigger would fail in production, perhaps unexpectedly, because you didn't know that there were January opportunities that had not been updated after the validation rule was introduced. If you were using SeeAllData = true, you may have caught this data inconsistency and been prepared to handle the exception cleanly.
I think custom settings are another place where I'd look to use the SeeAllData. In much of my apex code, I try to make the code flexible through a custom setting. So, for example, if I am integrating via an http callout, I'd try to put the endpoint url in a custom setting. Using SeeAllData = false, I could succesfully deploy to production without ever setting up the custom setting because my test methods create the custom setting. However, using SeeAllData = true, my test methods would fail because the custom setting had not been created in production. This allows me to be sure that my dependency is in place before bringing users back into the system.
So, there you have it. SeeAllData = true can be your friend. It's like bacon - plenty of people will tell you to avoid it, if you want to live. But I say a little bit in your life can be delicious.
